Check out our latest Case Law Briefs!
 
            Forgot login?   Register
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Go to bottomPost New TopicPost Reply Favoured: 0
TOPIC: Isn't this a no duh?
#70
Isn't this a no duh? 9 Months, 2 Weeks ago Karma: 0  
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before
publication in the New York Reports.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
No. 169
Georgia Hargett,
Respondent,
v.
Town of Ticonderoga et al.,
Appellants.

LIPPMAN, Chief Judge:
On this appeal, we must determine whether Eminent
Domain Procedure Law (EDPL) § 702 ( provides for reimbursement
of attorney's fees and costs when a condemnee successfully
challenges a condemnor's authority to acquire real property in
proceedings pursuant to EDPL 207 (A). Link here:
FindLaw
Enter code here   
Please note, although no boardcode and smiley buttons are shown, they are still useable
Director (Admin)
Admin
Posts: 41
graph
User Online Now Click here to see the profile of this user
Logged Logged  
 
Last Edit: 2009/11/24 12:39 By Director.
 
L. Deane Wilson, MA, ASA
Director, Eminent Domain Today
Ethicist,The Blackwell Institute
for the Study of Land Use Ethics
 
Reply Quote  
Go to topPost New TopicPost Reply

Status Center

We have 4 guests online

Current Members *Online*

None
Eminent Domain Today
Site Development by iTech Developers :: Ongoing management by The Blackwell Group